Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 2007No. 472PA06PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

In this case we determine an issue of first impression: Whether a positive urinalysis for marijuana metabolites alone is substantial evidence sufficient to prove that a defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed marijuana. We hold that this evidence alone is not sufficient, and therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In the early morning hours of 21 August 2004, Renetta Bryant arrived at a friend’s residence and observed defendant sitting in a chair in the front room snorting cocaine. Bryant testified that she bought a rock of crack cocaine…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. RobledoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. Foreman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API