Legal Opinion
State v. Everette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 9, 2007No. 452A05PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
This case represents the most recent chapter in our jurisprudence concerning the finite number of cases to which Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), applies, but North Carolina’s remedial sentencing legislation does not. We conclude that no error occurred in defendant’s trial and that defendant is not entitled to a new sentencing hearing.
*648The state’s evidence at trial tended to show the following: From 10:30 p.m. on 3 November 2001 until 2:30 a.m. on 4 November 2001, Officer Charles Savage of the Greenville Police Department was working as a security guard at a downtown…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- United States v. Edgar Parral-DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.