Legal Opinion

Klapper v. Guria

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter Tom, J.

In this action to recover damages for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, plaintiff, Harold Klapper, an attorney, moves for summary judgment on the complaint against all the defendants except New York University.

Defendants, Charles M. Guria, William E. Jackson, Hal R Lieberman and Richard Maltz (the State defendants), cross-move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2), (5) and (7) upon the grounds 1) the action is barred under the doctrine of quasi-judicial immunity; 2) absolute privilege; 3) plaintiff’s claims are, in part, time barred;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sassower v. ManganoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Thaler v. CasellaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Shimrak v. Garcia-MendozaNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Haagensen v. Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Pertilla v. Genetic Design, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API