Legal Opinion

Pertilla v. Genetic Design, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Irad S. Ingraham, J.

Plaintiffs bring the underlying action to recover for the alleged negligent performance of DNA testing. Defendant now moves for summary judgment dismissing the action upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

*844This matter was submitted to the court without oral argument on September 15, 1995.

FINDINGS OF FACT

In November 1991, plaintiff Lucille Pertilla filed a paternity and support petition against William B. Artist, the putative father of Alethia Pertilla. On February 13, 1993, Hon. Kevin M. Dowd of the Chenango County Family…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schanbarger v. KelloggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Tolisano v. TexonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Klapper v. GuriaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Deed v. CondrellNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Deed v. CondrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Smith v. Laboratory Corporation Holdings of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
  3. Spencer v. Omega Laboratories Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API