Shimrak v. Garcia-Mendoza
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Springer, J.;
Two cases have been consolidated for appeal. The first, Case No. 25100, is an appeal from an order dismissing Thomas D. Shimrak’s suit for money due for his services as a private investigator. The issue in this first appeal is whether the notation “Lau-Balance pd off” endorsed on the check issued by the Garcia-Mendoza law firm constitutes an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law. The second case, Case No. 25101, is also an *248appeal from an order dismissing Shimrak’s claim for compensation for services rendered to the Garcia-Mendoza firm. The second case…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hecht v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Edgar v. WagnerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Interstate Commercial Building Services, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.