Legal Opinion

Shimrak v. Garcia-Mendoza

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 25100, 25101PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.;

Two cases have been consolidated for appeal. The first, Case No. 25100, is an appeal from an order dismissing Thomas D. Shimrak’s suit for money due for his services as a private investigator. The issue in this first appeal is whether the notation “Lau-Balance pd off” endorsed on the check issued by the Garcia-Mendoza law firm constitutes an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law. The second case, Case No. 25101, is also an *248appeal from an order dismissing Shimrak’s claim for compensation for services rendered to the Garcia-Mendoza firm. The second case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Hecht v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Edgar v. WagnerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Interstate Commercial Building Services, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  4. Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  5. Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API