Nye v. Lowry
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
The appellant brought into the circuit court her petition for partition, alleging that she and the appellees *317were children of common ancestors, who had died intestate, the owners of the real estate described.
The defendants severed in their pleadings, as follows, to wit:
John D. Lowry, besides denying the petition, filed a cross complaint against the plaintiff and his co-defendants, claiming to be the sole owner of a specified part of the lands in question..
Malinda Burson and Robert Lowry denied the petition, and also filed a cross bill, wherein they claimed to be the sole •owners, as tenants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dearmond v. DearmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Reed v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Burkholder v. CasadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Taylor v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Shank v. ButschIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Vaughan v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Ashwell v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.