Legal Opinion
State v. France
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 4, 2005No. 29239-4-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 P.3d 654 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Duff Richard FRANCE, Appellant.
No. 29239-4-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
October 4, 2005.
John Michael Sheeran, Attorney at Law, Pierce County Prosecutor S, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
Lise Ellner, Attorney at Law, Vashon, WA, for Appellant.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, C.J.
¶ 1 A jury convicted Duff Richard France of violating a no-contact order and fourth degree assault. In his initial appeal, France claimed that the trial court erred by admitting statements he made before receiving Miranda[1] warnings. We agreed that France's statements…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HilliardWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CreachWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HeritageWashington Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Cruz BlackshearCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jesse Cole HunotteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Sergio Stuardo MonroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020