Legal Opinion
State v. France
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 4, 2005No. 29239-4-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*908¶1 Ajury convicted Duff Richard France of violating a no-contact order and fourth degree assault. In his initial appeal, France claimed that the trial court erred by admitting statements he made before receiving Miranda1 warnings. We agreed that France’s statements were the product of a custodial interrogation and should have been excluded. We found the error harmless as to his fourth degree assault conviction, but we reversed his conviction for violating a no-contact order and remanded for a new trial.
Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.
¶2 The State petitioned the Supreme Court for discretionary review and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HilliardWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CreachWashington Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Cruz BlackshearCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jesse Cole HunotteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Sergio Stuardo MonroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020