Legal Opinion

State v. Linehan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2002No. 71676-5PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 P.3d 542 (2002)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Timothy LINEHAN, Appellant.

No. 71676-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 9, 2002.

Decided October 24, 2002.

Francisco Rodriguez, Seattle, for Appellant.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Keith Scully, Deputy, James Whisman, Deputy, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

Petitioner Timothy Linehan seeks review of the Court of Appeals decision affirming his jury conviction on one count of first degree theft. We hold that any error in defining one alternative means of committing first degree theft was harmless, as there was sufficient evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API