Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Prater

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1990No. ACMR 8800576Published

1DissentGiuntini, Judge

I dissent. Like my Brothers, I am put off by a defense which seems to sanction the telling of lies. However, I cannot ignore the rationale behind the “exculpatory no” doctrine and its acceptance by the federal courts, including the United States Court of Military Appeals.

In United States v. Stark, 131 F.Supp. 190, 205 (D.Md.1955), the court explained that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 was intended to “protect the government against false pecuniary claims” and “to protect governmental agencies from perversion of their normal functioning.” Further, the court stated that the statute was enacted: “to protect…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. StarkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  5. United States v. Soledad Medina De PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API