Legal Opinion

United States v. Soledad Medina De Perez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1986No. 85-5121PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Soledad Medina de Perez appeals her conviction of two counts of making false statements to a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Perez contends that her responses to questions posed by federal agents during a post-arrest interrogation are not within the reach of the statute, and alternatively, that her statements, taken as a whole, are not material within the meaning of section 1001. We agree that section 1001 does not apply to a criminal defendant’s responses to investigative officers during a post-arrest interrogation, and therefore, we reverse.

I. FACTS

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. William H. White, Sr., United States of America v. Lester H. Finotti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Jerry A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Chung Ping Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API