Legal Opinion

United States v. Stark

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 18, 1955No. Crim. A. 22813, 22814PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The questions now before the court require the construction of title 18, § 1001, United States Code, with respect to its application to the factual situation arising in these cases, which are substantially identical in subject matter. For brevity it will be sufficient to refer to No. 22813, as the procedure involved in the questions raised are identical with case No. 22814.

On November 24, 1953 Albert Stark was indicted for alleged violation of section 1001 of title 18 U.S.C. The indictment in two counts in substance alleged that Albert Stark and Harry Bart were on and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. Beacon Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Eldred J. Paternostro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Rodriguez-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Fred LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Robert G. Bedore, A/K/A BedordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API