Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sittig v. Raney

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1921No. Civ. No. 2233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff petitioned the superior court of Napa County for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as auditor of said county, to issue to him his warrant on the treasurer of said county for the sum of $873.80 for services and materials alleged to have been performed and furnished by him for road repair purposes in said county.

Judgment awarding a peremptory writ of mandate as prayed for in the petition was given and entered, and from said judgment the defendant, auditor, appeals.

The claim which is the foundation of this suit is for the furnishing and delivery, upon the order of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. BozemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Carmichael v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. City of Brentwood v. Department of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API