Legal Opinion
Vagneur v. City of Aspen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 11, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 09SC1022PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez
T1 We granted certiorari review to consider whether two citizen-initiated proposed ordinances regarding the design and construction of a state highway entrance to the City of Aspen are administrative in character and therefore outside the scope of the initiative power reserved to the people under article V, sections 1(1) and 1(9) of the Colorado Constitution.1
*496T2 In 2007, Petitioners Curtis Vagneur and Jeffrey Evans (collectively, "Proponents") submitted two initiative petitions to the Aspen City Clerk regarding the highway entrance to Aspen. Respondents Les Holst, Clifford Weiss, and Terry…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- McKee v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Witcher v. Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Friends of Denver Parks, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- McCarville v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Friends of Congress Square Park v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Phillips v. City of WhitefishMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Colorado Mining Ass'n v. UrbinaColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.