McCarville v. City of Colorado Springs
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE NAVARRO
T1 This case presents the question whether the City of Colorado Springs (the City) may enforce its ordinances regulating the process for amending its home rule charter even though the State has also enacted a statute regulating this matter. Plaintiff, Roger McCarville, appeals the district court's judgment upholding the City's ordinances. Because the laws of the City and the State do not conflict, we hold that the ordinances may stand. We thus affirm the judgment in favor of the City.
I. Background
T2 McCarville filed with the City clerk a letter demanding to petition the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Pernell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- City of Aurora v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Kruse v. Town of Castle RockColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Webb v. City of Black HawkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wainscott v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Expedia, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- GEICO Casualty Co. v. CollinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Whitelaw, III v. Denver City CouncilColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Colorado Springs Citizens for Community Rights v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.