Legal Opinion

Witcher v. Canon City

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 17, 1986No. 84SA111, 84SA204PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*447ROYIRA, Justice.

This case is an appeal from the district court for Fremont County, challenging an amendment to the Royal Gorge Bridge and Park Lease entered into between Canon City (City) and the Royal Gorge Company of Colorado (Company).1 The district court held, on summary judgment, that the amendment was not subject to referendum under either the Colorado Constitution or the City Charter of Canon City, and that the amendment was not unconstitutional under article XI, sections 1 and 2, of the Colorado Constitution. We affirm.

I

In 1906, certain lands surrounding and including the Royal Gorge…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Cox v. Pearl Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. City and County of Denver v. Qwest Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API