Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1930No. 29,484PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action authorized by R. S. 68-301 for damages for personal injury alleged to have been sustained because of a defect of a county culvert or highway, of which defect the chairman of the board of county commissioners had notice for more than five days prior to the injury, and which injury was caused without contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The jury answered special questions and returned a general verdict for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The story of the casualty as disclosed by the record may be stated…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Reading Township v. TelferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Eikenberry v. Township of BazaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Watson v. Parker TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Board of Commissioners v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Stueve v. American Honda Motors Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
  2. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Township TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Gorges v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Houdashelt v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API