Legal Opinion

Totz v. Continental Du Page Acura

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 3, 1992No. 2-91-0633PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, Continental Du Page Acura (Continental), appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of Du Page County in favor of plaintiffs, Terrence and Mary Totz (Totzes). Following a bench trial, the court ruled that Continental had violated section 2 of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 1211/2, par. 262), with regard to the sale of a used car to the Totzes. The court awarded the Totzes $407.50 in compensatory damages, $5,000 in punitive damages, and $19,674.60 in costs and attorney fees. Continental argues on appeal that: (1) the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Warren v. LeMayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Miller v. William Chevrolet/GEO, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Paul Priebe v. Autobarn, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Maher & Associates, Inc. v. Quality CabinetsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API