Legal Opinion

Paul Priebe v. Autobarn, Limited

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 14, 2001No. 00-2497PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Paul Priebe (“Priebe”) bought a 1988 . Acura from The Autobarn, Limited (“Auto-barn”). While Autobarn offered no warranty, it told Priebe that the car had been inspected and had not been involved in any prior accidents. Through Autobarn, Priebe bought a service plan administered by Automobile Protection Corporation (“APCO”), an unaffiliated company. Roughly a month later, Priebe crashed the Acura and claimed that it had previous damage which made it dangerous to drive. Priebe sued Autobarn under both state and federal law, centering his claims around statutory and common…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Cramer v. Insurance Exchange AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Catherine Gardynski-Leschuck v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Totz v. Continental Du Page AcuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Carlisle v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. Burrell v. City of MattoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Muehlbauer v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API