Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1901No. 11,798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge. In banc.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

This was an action in ejectment. Defendant in error H. O. Bowman was the owner of a judgment against M. E. Martin which was a lien on the real estate in controversy. Henry King was the holder of a mortgage on the same property, executed and recorded after the rendition of the Bowman judgment and junior thereto. William Sims was also the owner of a judgment against Martin, which, at the time of its rendition, was inferior in time and lien to both the Bowman judgment and the King mortgage. This last judgment of Sims was bought by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chick v. WillettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  2. Warner v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Lichty v. McMartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Lamme v. John Schilling & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Spicer v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Kearny County Bank v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. BolingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Harris v. Southwest Nat. Bank of DallasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Farmers & Bankers Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API