Legal Opinion

Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Bolinger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1940No. 34,897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*701The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Action to recover on a promissory note was brought against appellants, makers of the note. This appeal is from an order sustaining a motion to strike out portions of their answer. One issue presented is whether the payee of a promissory note, secured by a second mortgage, is estopped from recovery on the note by virtue of a prior judgment in a foreclosure action brought by the holder of the first mortgage, and in which action, as holder of the second mortgage, he had been joined as one of the defendants. Other questions will be stated after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Security National Bank of Minneapolis v. PulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Lichty v. McMartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Security National Bank v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Security Benefit Ass'n v. SwartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Blair v. McQuarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Dupont v. Lotus Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Kearny County Bank v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Setchell v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Oaks v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API