Legal Opinion

Lamme v. John Schilling & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from, Brown District Court. ACTION brought by John Schilling & Co. against Damme and four other defendants, on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage. Trial at the October Term, 1876, of the district court, and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant Damme brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

John Lamme, who is the sole plaintiff in error in this court, and who' was one of the defendants in the court below, claims that the court below erred in rendering its judgment, and in making three certain orders in the case. We think, however, that the judgment and the orders must be affirmed.

The action was brought by John Schilling & Co., on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage, and to determine the priority of certain liens, as between themselves and certain of the defendants. There were four different claims, held by four…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Newsome v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Swisher v. McMainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Harris v. Southwest Nat. Bank of DallasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Overlander v. OverlanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API