Legal Opinion

Warner v. Lucas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1840PublishedCited by 24 opinions

This is a writ of error to the common pleas of the county of Ashtabula.

1Opinion of the CourtGrimke, J.

The error relied upon appears in a bill of exceptions. 388] The defendant in error was summoned as a witness *in a trial before a justice of the peace, in which the plaintiff in error was a party, and questions being put to him by the plaintiff in error, he refused absolutely to answer, on the ground that his answers would criminate him. This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the witness, for refusing to testify, under section 105 of the justice act, 29 Ohio L. 189. On this trial the plaintiff produced evidence to show what were the questions proposed to the defendant, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. People v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Clark v. ReyburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Miller v. FinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Rodman v. QuickIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hoyd v. Citizens Bank of Albany Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API