Legal Opinion

Kitsap County v. Allstate Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1998No. 65601-1PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified the following question to us: “Whether the claims against Kitsap County constitute ‘personal injury’ under each of the subject liability insurance policies.” Doc. 603 at App. A. For reasons that we set forth hereafter, we answer yes to the question insofar as it relates to policies that provide coverage for a personal injury arising from a “wrongful entry” and/or “other invasion of the right of private occupancy” but answer no as it relates to policies that provide coverage only for a personal injury arising…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McCormack Baron Management Services, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API