Federal Motor Finance v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from an order entered in a libel proceeding in which one Studebaker Commander 8 coupé, seized while being used by one Harold Tayson to conceal tax-unpaid illicit spirits in fraud of the revenue laws, has been decreed forfeited under Rev.St. § 3450 (26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1156, 1441). The appellant, Federal Motors Finance, a copartnership, intervened in the proceeding to invoke the court’s jurisdiction to remit the forfeiture as contemplated by section 204 (a) of the Act of 1935 (27 U. S.C.A. § 40a (a). It alleged that the automobile had been sold about…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. One 1935 Chevrolet CoupeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1936
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. One Terraplane SedanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.