Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1935 Chevrolet Coupe

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 16, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

Hearing was had upon the claim of the General Motors Acceptance Corporation to a Chevrolet automobile which has been decreed forfeited under Rev.St. § 3450 (26 U.S.C.A. § 1156), it having been seized while containing tax-unpaid illicit liquors admittedly deposited in fraud of the revenue laws.

From the evidence it appears that the car in question was sold by a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “dealer,” engaged in the business of selling automobiles; the sale being made by an agent of the dealer to one Edward Smith, who had a record and a well-deserved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. One Plymouth CoupéDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1935

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Federal Motor Finance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. CIT Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API