Legal Opinion

Pistorino & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 29, 1978No. C.D. 4779; Court Nos. 73-10-02910 and 74-9-02446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This consolidated civil action involves the classification of beam cutters or beam cutting machines and parts, manufactured by “Fipi” or “Atom” of Italy, imported from 1972 to 1974 and entered at the port of Boston, Mass, for the account of Hudson Shoe Machinery Co. The merchandise was invoiced as models F59, F63, F79S, and G888 electrohydraulic beam cutting machines or electrohydraulic beam presses.

On entiy, the merchandise was classified by the district director under item 678.50, Tariff Schedules of the United States as modified, by TJD. 68-9, as machines not specially provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. C. H. Powell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API