Legal Opinion

A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 4, 1981No. Court No. 77-4-00665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

At issue is the proper classification of articles known as torsionally flexible couplings and rubber parts which were manufactured in West Germany and entered at the port of Tampa, Florida in December 1975.

The importations were classified under item 680.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as shaft couplings and parts thereof and assessed duty at the rate of 9.5 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff contends that the importations constitute more than shaft couplings, thus precluding classification under item 680.50. Instead, plaintiff claims that the importations are properly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. Omark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. FAG Bearings, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API