Legal Opinion

Carter v. Pension Plan of A. Finkl & Sons Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 15, 2011No. 10-3287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

When a qualified pension plan decides to terminate, it must follow a careful and exacting process that ends with the plan purchasing annuities for all its beneficiaries from a third-party private insurance company. The A. FinH & Sons Pension Plan decided to voluntarily terminate, but after going through some extensive initial steps, it realized that it would be too expensive and formally withdrew from the process. At the heart of its decision was an amendment to the Plan that provided that if the Plan terminated, the employees could keep working at Finkl while still…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Kathleen Koszola v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. HeinzSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. William C. Davis, Cross-Appellee v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Regal-Beloit Corporation Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Killian v. Concert Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Killian v. Concert Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Phillips v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  5. Thondukolam v. Corteva, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API