Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Killian v. Concert Health Plan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 19, 2012No. 11-1112Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRipple, Circuit Judge

I join the majority’s resolution of Mr. Killian’s claim for statutory penalties, but I am unable to join the majority’s resolution of the remaining claims. Therefore, with great respect for the opinion of my colleagues, I concur in part and dissent in part.

A

Mr. Killian claims that Mrs. Killian was entitled to benefits under the Royal Management Corporation Health Insurance Plan (the “Plan”). As the majority explains, we review a fiduciary’s decision to deny benefits under the abuse of discretion standard where, as here, the plan documents give the “fiduciary discretionary authority to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Robert Westefer, Mark Vonperbandt, Allejandro Villazana v. Donald Snyder, Odie Washington, Michael v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API