Killian v. Concert Health Plan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRipple, Circuit Judge
I join the majority’s resolution of Mr. Killian’s claim for statutory penalties, but I am unable to join the majority’s resolution of the remaining claims. Therefore, with great respect for the opinion of my colleagues, I concur in part and dissent in part.
A
Mr. Killian claims that Mrs. Killian was entitled to benefits under the Royal Management Corporation Health Insurance Plan (the “Plan”). As the majority explains, we review a fiduciary’s decision to deny benefits under the abuse of discretion standard where, as here, the plan documents give the “fiduciary discretionary authority to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Robert Westefer, Mark Vonperbandt, Allejandro Villazana v. Donald Snyder, Odie Washington, Michael v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.