Legal Opinion

Carter v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 25, 2014No. 13-2822PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

A group of Finkl employees filed a lawsuit in the United States Tax Court alleging that a change in their defined pension plan violated the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code, or contractual anti-cutback 1 provisions of the plan. The Tax Court concluded that the employees’ claims were collaterally estopped by our decision in Carter v. Pension Plan of A. Finkl & Sons Co., 654 F.3d 719 (7th Cir.2011). We affirm.

I. Facts and procedural history

A. Finkl & Sons, Co., (“Finkl”) is a Delaware corporation based in Chicago that produces industrial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Reeves v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. DeGuelle v. CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Our Country Home Enterprises, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Midwest Operating Engineers v. DredgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Graffia v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Little Sandy Coal Company, Inc v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. Doe v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API