Carter v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
A group of Finkl employees filed a lawsuit in the United States Tax Court alleging that a change in their defined pension plan violated the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code, or contractual anti-cutback 1 provisions of the plan. The Tax Court concluded that the employees’ claims were collaterally estopped by our decision in Carter v. Pension Plan of A. Finkl & Sons Co., 654 F.3d 719 (7th Cir.2011). We affirm.
I. Facts and procedural history
A. Finkl & Sons, Co., (“Finkl”) is a Delaware corporation based in Chicago that produces industrial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Reeves v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- DeGuelle v. CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Our Country Home Enterprises, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Midwest Operating Engineers v. DredgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Graffia v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Little Sandy Coal Company, Inc v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Doe v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.