Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Frostell

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 16, 1982No. NMCM 81 0580PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty, at a general court-martial with members, of conspiracy to wrongfully introduce and transfer controlled substances in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 881. The panel of commissioned and enlisted members sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-1. The convening authority approved the sentence as awarded.

Appellant assigns eight errors for consideration by this Court. We deem…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SandersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. TyhurstU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. LoftinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. ZammitU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. SmithU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API