Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanders

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 22, 1991No. NMCM 91 0430PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLISON, Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response thereto, and we have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

At a special court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, the appellant pled guilty and was found guilty of one specification of unauthorized absence and one specification of wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Articles 86 and 112a, respectively, of the Uniform Code of Military…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. JemmingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. TimminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. MartindaleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. NewsomeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. ReapU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API