Legal Opinion

United States v. Loftin

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1989No. ACM 26957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Like the appellant in United States v. Tyhurst, 28 M.J. 671 (A.F.C.M.R.1989), Airman First Class (A1C) Loftin was convicted of numerous drug offenses under Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. He was found guilty of assault and absence without leave as well, in violation of Articles 128 and 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 928.1 As in Tyhurst, this appellant offered a conditional plea to wrongful use of a prohibited substance, an analog drug of 3, 4-methylenedioxy amphetamine, known as MDMA or “Ecstasy.”2

I

The drug offenses were charged under Article 112a, UCMJ. That…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. EttlesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Lester Grinspoon, M.D. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. David Augustine Desurra, and Sammy Lee Smith, United States of America v. Arthur Breaux, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. William SpainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TyhurstU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. CarrollArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. TyhurstU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API