Legal Opinion
Muckle v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2002No. D040086PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
Andrew Muckle (Andrew) petitions for a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate its order of April 4, 2002, denying his motion to quash service of summons in the action commenced by real party in interest Cassandra Burgess-Muckle (Cassandra) 1 for dissolution of their 11-year marriage, spousal support and property division, or dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum, and to enter a new and different order granting the motion. 2 The question raised is whether, consistent with the due process clause of the United States Constitution, California can…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Obrecht v. ObrechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Szynalski v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Abargil v. AbargilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- David L. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Mahidol v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.