Legal Opinion

Obrecht v. Obrecht

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2016No. H040827PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

— In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, appellant Raul Obrecht appeals from a default judgment requiring him to pay spousal support and attorney fees to his former wife, respondent Ingrid Obrecht. The appeal primarily revolves around the question whether Raul’s appearance at a hearing on a motion to enforce prior orders constituted a general appearance, such that the court acted properly in denying his later motion to quash service for lack of personal jurisdiction. A second issue involves the effect of untimely notice of an earlier hearing, and whether Raul…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. ViaView, Inc. v. RetzlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Ari Law v. Autonation.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. Asphalt Professionals v. Fairland Liquidating Corp. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Brue v. ShabaabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Chee v. Tesla Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API