Legal Opinion
Szynalski v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 2009No. B212278PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
Contending that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him, defendant Alexander “Alex” Szynalski, pursuant to the writ of mandate procedure in Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, subdivision (a)(1), challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to quash service of a summons and complaint. Szynalski contested personal jurisdiction over him in another California case—a class action—but that issue was not decided because the case settled. As part of the court-approved settlement agreement in that case, a court-appointed administrator of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Alexandria Real Estate etc. v. Bugsby Property, LLC CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Geiser v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- LA Community College Dist. v. GS Roosevelt CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
- McClain v. KisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.