Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Johnson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2003No. 01-0441PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

In this negligence case, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion when it instructed the jury that it could presume that certain missing evidence, had it been preserved, would have been adverse to defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Holding that the trial court had not abused its discretion in submitting this spoliation instruction, the court of appeals affirmed the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Monroe and Brandy Johnson. 39 S.W.3d 729. Wal-Mart petitioned for review, arguing that submitting this instruction was an abuse of discretion because the evidence in question…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. McCraw v. MarisTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In the Interest of V.L.K.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Shupe v. LingafelterTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Jerry AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. GJP, INC. v. Ghosh, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API