Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURT AM.
The question before us is whether the plaintiff Lorraine DeMoranville timely filed an employment discrimination claim with the Texas Commission on Human Rights. Because DeMoranville filed her complaint more than 180 days after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred, we hold that her claim is time-barred. We reverse in part the judgment of the court of appeals, 909 S.W.2d 90, and render judgment in favor of the petitioners.
In reviewing this summary judgment proceeding, we accept evidence favoring the non-movant, DeMoranville, as true. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Harold R. PRICE, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Abramson v. University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by249 opinions
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Evans v. The City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. ChathaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Pegram v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.