Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2013No. CC 05C51184; CA A135075; SC S058504PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*442LINDER, J.

This is one of three cases that we decide today in which we examine the legal standard for what constitutes a seizure under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1 All three cases involve police contacts with individuals in which, at the outset of the contact, the officers asked the individuals for identification. In the first of the three cases, State v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 412-13, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), we held that an officer’s request for and verification of a person’s identification are not acts that, in and of themselves, convert an encounter that is not a seizure…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. HighleyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. Reyes-HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. Soto-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API