Pacific National Cellular v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The above-captioned case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and on cross-motions for summary judgment by the parties pursuant to RCFC 56. The plaintiff, Pacific National Cellular (Pacific) filed a complaint against the United States which seeks relief in the amount of $221,384.60, consisting of commitment fees, legal fees and settlement costs, plus economic loss of business for a four-year period on both claims. Plaintiff claims that the…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Cox v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Edwin P. Wilson v. United States Parole Commission J.T. Holland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.