Legal Opinion

Pacific National Cellular v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 1998No. 95-305CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and on cross-motions for summary judgment by the parties pursuant to RCFC 56. The plaintiff, Pacific National Cellular (Pacific) filed a complaint against the United States which seeks relief in the amount of $221,384.60, consisting of commitment fees, legal fees and settlement costs, plus economic loss of business for a four-year period on both claims. Plaintiff claims that the…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Cox v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Edwin P. Wilson v. United States Parole Commission J.T. Holland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API