Legal Opinion

Biersdorf v. Putnam

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1947PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This suit was instituted by Phoebe Biersdorf against Lillian B. Putnam, Mable L. Biersdorf, Inez E. Bice, Edgar A. Biersdorf and Verna E. Luedtke, to have set aside an instrument, executed by the parties to this litigation on or about June 4,1945, reading as follows:

“In consideration of the sum of One Dollar and other valuable consideration paid by Phoebe D. Biersdorf, widow of Herman B. Biersdorf, deceased, to children of said Herman B. Biersdorf, deceased, namely, Lillian B. Putnam, Edgar A. Biersdorf, Mabel L. Biersdorf and Verna E. Luedtke and Inez E. Bice, and in consideration of the sum…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  2. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Marks v. Twohy Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Coker v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Winningham v. DyoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Portland Web Pressmen's Union Local No. 17 v. Oregonian Publishing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  4. Bogle v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kergil v. Central Oregon Fir Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API