Legal Opinion
Coker v. Richey
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1921PublishedCited by 16 opinions
From Union: Gilbert W. Phelps, Judge. In Banc. In Banc.
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, O. J.
The plaintiffs .Coker and Bellamy aver that they are and have been since May 22, 1920, partners under the firm name of “Eastern Oregon Music Company,” and that they have filed *17the certificate required by law, with the county clerk of Union County, Oregon. The complaint avers that the defendant Bichey was carrying on a general retail music business at La Grande, Oregon, selling pianos, piano-players, phonographs and other musical instruments, and that:
“On January 15, 1920, for a valuable consideration, the said defendant sold and delivered to this plaintiff, B. H. Coker, all the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Marks v. Twohy Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Sund & Co. v. Flagg & Standifer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Feenaughty v. BeallOregon Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Apple v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- J. L. Davis, Inc. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Perthou v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.