Russellville Gas Company v. Duggar
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Judge.
This is a case involving a claim forWorlcmen’s Compensation. Claimant, Cecil Judson Duggar, was employed as a driver-of a liquid petroleum gas truck by Russell-ville Gas Company, Inc. Duggar was paid' a salary and commission. At night and on weekends he took the truck home with him. Other drivers for the company did the same. If a customer within his territory needed a delivery at night or on weekends,. Duggar made such delivery directly from-his home if the truck contained the necessary gas. If it was emptied he refilled it at the plant and returned'to his home. He-often took…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. ManascoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Gibbons v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Sam's Place v. MiddletonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Allen v. GenryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russellville Gas Co. v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Turner v. DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Union Camp Corporation v. BlackmonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Paige v. CITY OF RAHWAY, WATER DEPARTMENTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Paige v. CITY OF RAHWAY, WATER DEPARTMENTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977