Paige v. CITY OF RAHWAY, WATER DEPARTMENT
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentSchreiber, J.
The majority holds that an employee who was injured after arriving home from his regular work schedule is entitled to worker’s compensation simply because he was on call. Rather than acknowledging that the going and coming rule no longer has any vitality in view of its decisions today, Wyatt v. Metropolitan Maintenance Co., 74 N. J. 167 (1977), Watson v. Nassau Inn, 74 N. J. 155 (1977), and Briggs v. American Biltrite, 74 N. J. 185 (1977), and its previous decision in Hornyak v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 63 N. J. 99 (1973), the Court has extended compensability to the situation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foster v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Russellville Gas Company v. DuggarCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Thornton v. Texarkana Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951