Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCree

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Henry McCree (appellant/defendant) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (DeFino-Nastasi, J.), after a bench trial in which he was convicted of possession with intent to deliver (PWTD) Xanax, a controlled substance. 1 On appeal, appellant argues: (1) that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain a conviction for PWID, and (2) that the court improperly admitted pill bottles found after the police conducted a war-rantless search of the car that appellant was driving. For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. McCreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Eiser v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. TurnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API