Legal Opinion

Esmeralda County v. Third Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884No. 1189PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Hawley, C. J.:

Petitioner claims that the act annexing a portion of Esmeralda county to Lyon county (Stat. 1883, 99) is unconstitutional in this : that it imposes duties upon the district judge, (section 6,) that are not judicial in their nature, in contravention of article III of the state constitution ; that, inasmuch as the boards of county commissioners failed to act within the time prescribed by section 2, the entire pro*439visions of the act are absolutely null and void. Respondents contend that if the acts conferred upon the district judge by the sixth section are not judicial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Corwin v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. In re the Saline County Subscription, ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. People ex rel. McDonald v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. People ex rel. Cochran v. Bd. of Educ. of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Comrs. of Mason v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lansdon v. State Board of CanvassersIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kinsloe v. PogueIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. OsburnNevada Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API