Legal Opinion

People ex rel. McDonald v. Bush

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1870No. , 2,597PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court, Crockett, J., and Temple, J., concurring:

It appears that proceedings were instituted in tbe District Court for Los Angeles County, against three of tbe *345Supervisors of San -Diego County, for tbe purpose of removing tbem from office, under tbe provisions of tbe Act of March 14, 1853. (Stats. 1853, p. 40. and Hit. Dig., Section 4,778.) Tbe second section of tbe Act is as follows: “If any person now bolding, or wbo shall hereafter bold, any office in this State, wbo shall refuse or n«glect to perform any official act, in manner and form as now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API