Legal Opinion

Jackson State Bank v. Homar

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1992No. 91-134PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Jackson State Bank appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to stay proceedings and for arbitration in a dispute concerning an arbitration clause in a lease agreement involving appellees Frank A. Homar, Sally Homar, Paul Ho-mar and Linda Martin, d/b/a Flat Creek Holdings and Chad R. Budge.

We reverse the lower court’s denial and remand this case for arbitration.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues on appeal:

I. Whether § l-36-104(a) W.S.1977, as amended, requires a plaintiff to allege in his complaint that the opposing party has refused to arbitrate.

II…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. N&d Fashions, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Nelly Don, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McBride v. Peak Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API