Shoobert v. De Motta
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order denying a new trial. W. W. Cross, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
June 22, 1893, one Cascalia executed a mortgage to the plaintiffs’assignor upon a band of sheep which were then in Kings county, consisting of seventeen hundred ewes and ten hundred and fifty lambs. The sheep were afterward removed to Tulare county, *217and in August, 1893, while they were in Tulare county, bucks were put with the ewes, and during the months of January and February, 1894, there were born, as the offspring of the ewes, thirteen hundred .lambs. The court finds that the period of gestation in the case of sheep is about five months. April 18, 1894, Cascalia, in consideration of an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bank of Ukiah v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Kellogg v. LovelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Forman v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Funk v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Gans v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alferitz v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Battle Creek Valley Bank v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Diggs v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.